July 15, 2009

Digital media vs. the world’s closed societies

Filed under: Journalism Program,Press Freedom — Claire Austin @ 9:48 am

Notes from the war between cyber dissidents and their repressive governments…

On June 16th, the State Department quietly asked twitter not to undergo a scheduled maintenance because the texting service had become a main medium for news about Iranian election protests. Since then, the Iranian government has shut down cell phone connections and SMS texting. Protesters have switched to word of mouth and personal cameras.

Over 100 journalists from around the world have been petitioning for the release of Newsweek correspondent Maziar Bahari, who has been in an Tehran prison since June 21st.

In North Korea, American journalists Laura Ling and Euna Lee are still being held, though not at a work camp, as the government demands an apology. Their crime? Entering the country without permission to do stories for Current TV, Al Gore’s TV network/web site focused on video “pods” aimed at young people. For more on Laura, Euna, and other women journalists who have been detained abroad, visit the International Women’s Media Foundation.

Comittee to Protect Journalists line graph

According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, Iran has replaced China as the world’s top jailer of journalists, though China has been detaining TV crews and cutting Internet connections in Xinjiang, where there are riots over the treatment of the Muslim minority.

CPJ pie chart

The World Press Freedom Committee points out that only 21 percent of the world’s people live in countries with a fully free press. However, the remaining nations hold a majority in every intergovernmental organization where press freedom issues are considered.

The preceding graphs are from the Committee to Protect Journalists' 2008 prison census: Online and in jail, released December 4, 2008.

ShareThis

One Response to “Digital media vs. the world’s closed societies”

  1. SusanNo Gravatar Says:

    Looking at this graph, it is hard to miss the huge jump from 81 in 2000 to 139 only two years later (it drops by only one in 2003). I would be interested to know what was going on that accounts for this spike, or which countries in particular contributed to it. I am also curious about the 2-year drop from 1998 to 2000. There was obviously something big going on during these 4 years. Also, how much can be attributed to the presence of more female journalists. I would imagine that women, especially, would be far less welcome in nations with restricted media - as restrictions on women seem to be more pronounced in many of these countries as well.


Password: